crazy dufflebag man
last night mark drove through the mist that blanketed los angeles to the nuart to catch a screening of "in cold blood." as i've previously mentioned, i loved "capote" but have not had the pleasure of reading the book "in cold blood" nor have i seen the film adaptation. jessica tells me she loved the book, while mark loved the film.
standing in the lobby waiting for the film to start we were chatting with the theatre manager about the film. some guy, a stranger, who had just seen the film inserted himself into the conversation. first of all i hate when people do that. so he was all "you haven't seen the movie before?" and i was all "no, but i loved capote so my interest was piqued." so he explained that, like myself, he saw "capote" and then saw "in cold blood." at this point it became apparent that he'd just gotten off the crazy train. he suddenly became somewhat angry and agitated at capote. "why it's nothing more than a REMAKE!" he exclaimed. "except that the capote character in the original, instead of being.." (he then kind of cocked his hip to one side and held up his hand, his pinkie extended in some sort of silent film style pantomime of a sissy) "...he's just a regular straight-talking joe." he didn't actually say "straight-talking" but it was something like that. even though i suspected that he was wrong, i couldn't argue with him. or maybe i didn't want to. the crazy man continued on his tirade. "and THEN phillip seymore hoffman goes and wins an oscar. FOR A REMAKE!" i believe i shrugged. the man, who was carrying a large duffle bag, then headed for the exit shouting back, "you'll see!"
now that i've seen the movie, all i have to say is that crazy dufflebag man is completely wrong about everything. WRONG. you're wrong, crazy dufflebag man.
